Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/1611/2026 of FASIR UDDIN ALIAS FOZOR UDDIN ALIAS FADIOR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS on 1 September 2026
GAHC010288662025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No: I.A.(Civil)/1611/2026 FASIR UDDIN ALIAS FOZOR UDDIN ALIAS FADIOR S/O- LATE BAJITULLA @ BAJITULLA SHEIKH @ BASTULLA @ KUJITULLA SHEIKH @ BAJIT. R/O-VILL- SARUHARID P.S-SORBHOG
GAHC010288662025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No: I.A.(Civil)/1611/2026
FASIR UDDIN ALIAS FOZOR UDDIN ALIAS FADIOR
S/O- LATE BAJITULLA @ BAJITULLA SHEIKH @ BASTULLA @ KUJITULLA
SHEIKH @ BAJIT. R/O-VILL- SARUHARID
P.S-SORBHOG DISTRICT- BARPETA
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI
110001.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
NEW DELHI
110001.
4:THE STATE COORDINATOR
NRC ASSAM
ACHYUT PLAZA
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-5.
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BARPETA
ASSAM
781301.
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
BARPETA
ASSAM
781301.
7:THE O/C
SORBHOG POLICE STATION
DIST-BARPETA
------------
Advocate for : MR. J AHMED
Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 02.09.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) All sides are duly represented.
2. Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that this Court by order dated 24.04.2026, passed in the connected WP(C) 692/2026 had granted bail the applicant, namely, Fasir Uddin @ Fozor Uddin @ Fadior. However, when the applicant appeared before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta, as the FT case number has not been mentioned in the said order, the bail bond could not be accepted.
3. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to provide that in the connected writ petition, the applicant has assailed the opinion dated 29.11.2022, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Barpeta 11th, Assam in Case No. (Bpt/11th) F.T. 932/2016, corresponding to P.E. No. IMDT Case No. 980/2K, date 4-12-2K.
4. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to provide that in the event the applicant above named appears before the Superintendent of Police (Border), Barpeta within 10 (ten) days from the date of the order and furnish bail bond in terms of the order dated 24.04.2026, the said authority shall do the needful in terms of the order dated 24.04.2026.
5. This order shall be read together with order dated 24.04.2026, passed in WP(C) 692/2026.
6. This interlocutory application stands allowed to the extent as indicated above and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant