Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4569/2025 of GOLAP HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 5 ORS on 1 September 2026
GAHC010175402025 2026:GAU-AS:12670 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4569/2025 GOLAP HUSSAIN S/O- NABJES ALI, R/O- VILL.- BONBAHAR, P.O. KAYAKUCHI, P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781352. VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND
GAHC010175402025
2026:GAU-AS:12670
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4569/2025
GOLAP HUSSAIN
S/O- NABJES ALI, R/O- VILL.- BONBAHAR, P.O. KAYAKUCHI, P.S. AND DIST.
BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781352.
VERSUS
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT
STATE BANK OF INDIA BHAVAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI-400021.
2:ZONAL MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
ZONAL OFFICE
BHANGAGARH
GUWAHATI-781006.
3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
SURVEILLANCE AND INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT
STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
WEST GANDHI MAIDAN
PATNA
PIN- 800001.
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
HATIGAON BRANCH
HATIGAON
GUWAHATI
GUWAHATI-781038
DIST. KAMRUP METRO
ASSAM
5:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
KAYAKUCHI BRANCH
BARPETA
DIST. BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN- 781352.
6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
DELHI CENTRAL CYBER POLICE STATION
POLICE HEADQUARTERS
JAI SINGH MARG
NEW DELHI-110001
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. SH Sikdar Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. SR Baruah, Govt. Advocate B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.09.2026
Heard Mr. SH Sikdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the SOP dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home, whereby there is a Grievance Redressal Mechanism set up under Section III, the petitioner would be well advised to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority.
3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Before parting with the records, this Court, however, observes that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not preclude or prejudice the petitioner to approach the respondent Nos.4 and 5 by submitting separate complaints as regards the freezing of the petitioner’s bank account. Upon such complaints being submitted before the respondent Nos.4 and 5, the said respondents shall initiate the process of Grievance Redressal Mechanism as stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure dated 02.01.2026 and take effective steps for bringing the grievance of the petitioner to a logical conclusion.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant