Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./2520/2026 of SRI MASTER HAMBROM AND 7 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 30 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010186882026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2520/2026 SRI MASTER HAMBROM AND 7 ORS. S/O-LT. THAKUR HEMBROM 2: SRI DIBILAL HASDA S/O- LT. MANGAL HASDA PETITIONER NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/O VILL- NAYA GAON P.S.-

GAHC010186882026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./2520/2026

SRI MASTER HAMBROM AND 7 ORS.

S/O-LT. THAKUR HEMBROM

2: SRI DIBILAL HASDA

S/O- LT. MANGAL HASDA

PETITIONER NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/O VILL- NAYA GAON

P.S.- GOSSAIGAON

DIST.- KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

3: MD MAKKA SEIKH

S/O- MD. SAHJALAL SEIKH

4: MD ABBAS ALI SEIKH ALIAS ABBAS ALI SK

S/O- MD. NAJAR ALI SEIKH

5: MD NURUDDIN SEIKH ALIAS NURUIT SK

S/O- MD. NAJAR ALI SEIKH

PETITIONER NOS. 3

4 AND 5 ARE R/O VILL- BORJAN PT. I

P.S.- TAMARHAT

DIST.- DHUBRI

ASSAM.

6: MD KHAIRUL ALAM ISLAM ALIAS KHAIRUL ALAM

S/O- MD. MUZAFAR ALI

7: MD NUR JAMAL SAIKH NURJAMAL SK

S/O- LT. BILAL HUSSAIN

8: MD BOKTAR HUSSAIN

S/O- LT. IBRAHIM ALI

PETITIONER NOS. 6

7 AND 8 ARE R/O VILL- NO.1 BHUMURA BILL

P.S.- GOSSAIGAON

DIST.- KOKRAJHAR

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M I HUSSAIN, MUSTAFIZUR RAHMAN,R KHA,M

AHMED,MS. P AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 31.08.2026 Heard Mr. M. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam.

2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 whereby the petitioners, namely, 1. SriMaster Hambrom, 2. Sri Dibilal Hasda, 3. Md. Makka Seikh, 4. Md. Abbas Ali Seikh @ Abbas Ali SK, 5. Md. Nuruddin Seikh @ Nuruit Sk, 6. Md. Khairul Alam Islam @ Khairul Alam, 7. Md. Nur Jamal Saikh Nurjamal Sk and 8. Md. Boktar Hussain, have prayed for releasing the on bail after they were arrested on 30.06.2026 in connection with Simaluguri Police Station Case No. 22/2026 registered under Section 20(b) (ii)

(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners have been arrested was lodged on 30.06.2026 by the complainant, Bidyut Bikas Baruah, SI of Simaluguri Police Station, District-Sivasagar, Assam, stating, inter alia, that the O/C, Simaluguri P.S., received information to the effect that some persons from Kokrajhar had brought Ganja by train and got down at Simaluguri Railway Station, and were proceeding towards Santak by e-rickshaw via Luthuri Gaon. Thereafter, the I/O, along with his staff, set up a naka checking at about 12:30 a.m. and intercepted two e-rickshaws bearing Registration Nos. AS-04-ER/6470 and AS-04-ER/3424. Two packets of suspected Ganja were recovered from the said e-rickshaws, containing 800 grams and 282 grams, respectively, each packet being wrapped in white-coloured paper. Thereafter, the said suspected Ganja was seized at about 3:30 a.m. on 30.06.2026.

4. It is submitted that, as per the seizure list, the petitioners were arrested on 30.06.2026 at 3:30 p.m. and were forwarded to the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M), Nazira on 01.07.2026 at 1:00 p.m., which is beyond 24 hours from the time of their detention. Such detention beyond the period of 24 hours is in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, entitles the petitioners to bail.

5. Perusal of the aforesaid seizure list and the forwarding report substantiates the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

6. Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam did not dispute the same.

7. Having regard to the material available on record and that the petitioners have been spent 63 days behind the bar, I am of the view that the petitioners should be released on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only each with two sureties each, of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Eleka Magistrate/Jurisdictional Court in connection with Simaluguri Police Station Case No. 22/2026 registered under Section 20(b) (ii) (B) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

8. It is further provided that the petitioners shall regularly participate in the trial and shall not try to tamper with the remaining witnesses.

9. Accordingly, the bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead