Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/884/2026 of SRI SUKLAL BARMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 30 August 2026
GAHC010181712026 2026:GAU-AS:12530-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/884/2026 SRI SUKLAL BARMAN SON OF LATE BIPIN BARMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEOSUNGA UNDER GORESWAR POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF TAMULPUR, BTR,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010181712026
2026:GAU-AS:12530-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/884/2026
SRI SUKLAL BARMAN
SON OF LATE BIPIN BARMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEOSUNGA UNDER
GORESWAR POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF TAMULPUR, BTR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0
SRI SUKLAL BARMAN
SON OF LATE BIPIN BARMAN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEOSUNGA UNDER GORESWAR POLICE STATION
IN THE District OF TAMULPUR
BTR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM
------------
Advocate for : UJJAL CHOUDHURY
Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 31.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 278 days in filing the appeal against the conviction under Section 302 IPC. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. PP submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 278 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same accordingly. The IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant