Gauhati High Court

AB/634/2026 of PULAK DEB NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 30 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010057212026 2026:GAU-AS:12567 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/634/2026 PULAK DEB NATH S/O PRADIP DEB NATH RESIDENT OF VILL- BAROBISHA,DOKHIN RAMPUR,P.O. BAROBISHA, DIST. ALIPURDUWAR, WEST BENGAL. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010057212026

2026:GAU-AS:12567

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/634/2026

PULAK DEB NATH

S/O PRADIP DEB NATH

RESIDENT OF VILL- BAROBISHA,DOKHIN RAMPUR,P.O. BAROBISHA, DIST. ALIPURDUWAR, WEST BENGAL.

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BEHARBARI, SANKUCHI PATH, P.O. AND P.S.

BASISTHA, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REP BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MR. S ISLAM,MS J AKTAR

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

31.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for Page No.# 2/2 granting of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in connection with Bilasipara P.S. Case No. 24/2026 registered under Section 305/291 of the BNS, read with Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 & Section 13(1) Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

3. The petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle involved in the incident, wherein a certain number of cattle were intercepted from the said vehicle. This Court, by order dated 23.03.2026, granted interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, pursuant to which he has appeared before the Investigating Officer (IO), and his statement has been submitted by the learned counsel.

4. Subsequently, a charge sheet has also been filed as informed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. Having regard to the nature of the allegations and the fact of the investigation, being over, the order of interim pre-arrest bail is hereby made absolute.

6. It is further provided that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial if one commences.

7. The bail petition stands allowed accordingly.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead