Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4207/2026 of NGO NABAKIRAN AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 27 August 2026
GAHC010163262026 2026:GAU-AS:12386 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4207/2026 NGO NABAKIRAN AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER JALAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA ADD- GHAGRAPAR PART II, P.O. SALCHAPRA, P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT-
GAHC010163262026
2026:GAU-AS:12386
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4207/2026
NGO NABAKIRAN AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER JALAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA
ADD- GHAGRAPAR PART II, P.O. SALCHAPRA, P.S. SILCHAR, DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM
2: JALAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA
SON OF LATE NUR UDDIN BARBHUIYA
VILL RAMNAGAR
LAMARGRAM PART IV
P.O. SILCHAR
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM PIN 78800
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
NIRVACHAN SADAN
ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI 110001
3:THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER
ASSAM
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER
ASSAM
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
4:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006
5:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
ASSAM
KHANAPARA
GUWAHATI- 781022
6:THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
CACHAR
SILCHAR
DISTRICT- CACHAR
ASSAM
7:DR RAHUL CHAKRABORTY
S/O RABINDRA KUMAR CHAKRABORTY
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE (DL-I) AND IN CHARGE
DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER
CACHAR
SILCHAR DAK BANGLAW ROAD
SILCHAR OFFICE PARA
PIN- 78800
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K MIRA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ECI, GA, ASSAM,SC, AGRI. DEPARTMENT
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.08.2026
The maintainability of the writ petition is in question, since the petitioner No. 1 is an NGO and seeking transfer of the respondent No. 7. Mr. K. Mira, learned counsel appears for the petitioners and Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate appears for the respondent No. 1; Ms. S. Katakey, learned counsel appears for the ECI (respondent No. 2 & 3), and Ms. G. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Agriculture Department, appears for the respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 6. Therefore, the maintainability of the writ petition is in question. At this stage, Mr. K. Mira, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. As prayed for, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant