Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2297/2026 of ZAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS JAKIR HUSSAIN AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 27 August 2026
GAHC010167792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2297/2026 ZAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS JAKIR HUSSAIN AND ANR S/O SORHAV ALI VILL- SHAWRACHARA, P.S.- KALGACHIA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM. 2: MUKHTAR ALI @ MUKTAR ALI S/O
GAHC010167792026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2297/2026
ZAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS JAKIR HUSSAIN AND ANR
S/O SORHAV ALI
VILL- SHAWRACHARA, P.S.- KALGACHIA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM.
2: MUKHTAR ALI @ MUKTAR ALI
S/O LATE RUSTOM ALI
VILL- SHAWRACHARA
P.S.- KALGACHIA
DIST.- BARPETA
ASSA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MISS. S PARBIN,MR H A AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.08
. 2026 Heard Mr. H.A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for granting regular bail to the petitioners, namely, Zakir Hussain @ Jakir Hussain and Mukhtar Ali @ Muktar Ali, who were arrested on 03.05.2026 and since then they are in judicial custody, in connection with Special NDPS Case No. 36/2026 under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B)/ 29 of NDPS Act, pending before the learned Special Judge, Barpeta, (arising out of Kalgachia P.S. Case No. 43/2026).
3. The scanned copy of the TCR call for has been received.
4. The learned counsel has submitted that 6 (six) out of the 9 (nine) witnesses have been examined and the quantity which has been allegedly recovered is of intermediate range.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners would participate in the trial proceedings without fail.
6. Accordingly, he has prayed for consideration of bail for the petitioners.
7. In the circumstances, I am of the considered view that the petitioners can be allowed the privilege of bail; the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.
8. The learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to impose such other conditions as may be required to ensure the participation of the petitioners in the trial proceedings.
9. Bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant