Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2420/2026 of MD SAIFUDDIN HUSSAIN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 27 August 2026
GAHC010178632026 2026:GAU-AS:12429 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2420/2026 MD SAIFUDDIN HUSSAIN S/O LATE SAMSUDDIN HUSSAIN, VILLAGE HARILAL BASTI, P.S. DIPHU, DISTRICT KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782460. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010178632026
2026:GAU-AS:12429
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2420/2026
MD SAIFUDDIN HUSSAIN
S/O LATE SAMSUDDIN HUSSAIN, VILLAGE HARILAL BASTI, P.S. DIPHU, DISTRICT KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN-782460.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A A DEWAN, MR H A RASHID
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. A. Dewan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Md. Saifuddin Hussain, has prayed for bail in connection with Sonapur PS Case No. 118/2026 (corresponding to GR No. 3382/2026) u/s Page No.# 2/2 281/105/324(4)/324(5) of BNS
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite taking precautions the incident took place and he is in no way responsible for any criminal negligence or knowledge of causing death in the unfortunate incident. It is also submitted that the wife of the petitioner has recently gave birth to a child and for which he needs to be near to his family.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that it is revealed from the mouth of some of the witnesses that the vehicle was in high speed at the relevant time. Nevertheless, considering the facts and circumstances, the progress of investigation and length of detention, the petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioner:
(a) shall co-operate with remaining investigation; (b) shall not hamper or tamper with evidence;
5. In view of the above, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
6. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant