Gauhati High Court
AB/2052/2026 of MD TAJAMUL ALI LASKAR AND 2 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 27 August 2026
GAHC010182232026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2052/2026 MD TAJAMUL ALI LASKAR AND 2 ORS. SON OF LATE ABDUL LATIF LASKAR 2: MD JALAL UDDIN LASKAR SON OF LATE ABDUL LATIF LASKAR 3: MD BILAL UDDIN LASKAR SON OF LATE
GAHC010182232026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/2052/2026
MD TAJAMUL ALI LASKAR AND 2 ORS.
SON OF LATE ABDUL LATIF LASKAR
2: MD JALAL UDDIN LASKAR
SON OF LATE ABDUL LATIF LASKAR
3: MD BILAL UDDIN LASKAR
SON OF LATE ABDUL LATIF LASKAR
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-KHASPUR BHAGER KONA
P.O.-SALGANGA
P.S.- UDHARBOND
DISTRICT-CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78803
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ISLAM, MR R I BHUYAN,MR. T K DEY,MS. L WAJEEDA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.08.2026 Heard Ms. L. Wajeeda, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. By this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners, namely, 1. Md. Tajamul Ali Laskar, 2. Md. Jalal Uddin Laskar and 3. Md. BIlal Uddin Laskar, have prayed for grant of pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. Case No.40/2024 under Sections 447/143/436/427/506/511/33 of the IPC The petitioners have received summons to appear as accused in the connected case on 20.07.2026 at 10:00 am. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners failed to appear for good reasons and the petitioners are aged about 65 years, 60 year and 57 years respectively. The learned counsel has submitted that the next date fixed for appearance of the petitioners is on 07.09.2026 and they apprehend that they may be arrested to face the trial in the aforesaid case. Having regard to the age of the petitioners and also the undertaking given by the petitioners through the counsel that they would appear and contest the accusation made against them during the trial without fail, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners shall be allowed the privilege of pre- arrest bail in the aforesaid matter. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest in connection with the aforesaid case, the petitioners named above shall be released on pre-arrest bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Cachar.
Anticipatory bail application disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant