Gauhati High Court
AB/1768/2026 of JAHIRA BIBI ALIAS JOHARA BIB AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 27 August 2026
GAHC010160342026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1768/2026 JAHIRA BIBI ALIAS JOHARA BIB AND ANR W/O. AJIBAR RAHMAN RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-SONALUGURI, P.O.-RANIGANJ, P.S.-SAPATGRAM, DISTRICT-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783337. 2:
GAHC010160342026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1768/2026
JAHIRA BIBI ALIAS JOHARA BIB AND ANR
W/O. AJIBAR RAHMAN
RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-SONALUGURI, P.O.-RANIGANJ, P.S.-SAPATGRAM, DISTRICT-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783337.
2: SIDDIKA BIBI @ SIDDIKA BEGUM
D/O. SEKENDAR ALI RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-SONALUGURI
P.O.-RANIGANJ
P.S.-SAPATGRAM
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-78333
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:HASINA BIBI
W/O. LATE JOHIRUDDIN
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SONALUGURI
P.S.-SAPATGRAM
DISTRICT-DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN-783337
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, MS A KHATUN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, D GOSWAMI(R2),MR D BHATTACHARYA(R2)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28.08.2026 Heard Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No. 1.
2. Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners who submits that the petitioners are the mother and the co-villagers of the accused No. 1, who has established physical relationship with the minor daughter of the informant. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners being the ladies may be granted to the privilege of pre-arrest bail.
3. The learned APP has submitted that the investigation has culminated in a charge sheet being CS No. 82/2026, dated 31.07.2026 in connection with Sapatgram PS Case No. 73/2026 (corresponding to GR Case No. 380/2026) registered under Sections 64(1)/ 88/ 89 of the BNS, 2023, read with Sections 6/17 of the POCSO Act.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners would be appeared before the learned Trial Court and in the event summons is received by them.
5. Observing that after submission of charge sheet, there is no apprehension of arrest by the investigating authority, this anticipatory bail application is closed, by allowing the petitioners to appear before the learned Trial Court as and when summons are received and pray for appropriate relief.
6. Bail application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant