Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3834/2026 of MD SHAHED ALI AND 4 ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010144172026 2026:GAU-AS:12469 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3834/2026 MD SHAHED ALI AND 4 ORS S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH, R/O VILLAGE- MAZDIA, P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM. 2: ROMES ALI S/O- LATE

GAHC010144172026

2026:GAU-AS:12469

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3834/2026

MD SHAHED ALI AND 4 ORS

S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH, R/O VILLAGE- MAZDIA, P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM.

2: ROMES ALI

S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH

R/O VILLAGE- MAZDIA

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM.

3: MOHAMMAD ALI

S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH R/O VILLAGE- MAZDIA

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM

4: KAMRUZ ZAMAN

S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH

R/O VILLAGE- MAZDIA

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM

5: HARUN AL RASHID

S/O- LATE MUZAFAR GAONBURAH

R/O VILLAGE- GAREMARI

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-06.

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE BRANCH)

BARPETA

DISTRICT-BARPETA

ASSAM

3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE BRANCH)

BARPETA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM.

4:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER

BARPETA

DISTRICT - BARPETA

ASSAM.

5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER

SARTHEBARI REVENUE CIRCLE

P.O- SARTHEBARI

DIST-BARPETA

ASSAM

PIN-781307.

6:ADARSHA VIDYAPEETH

MAZDIA ALIAS ADARSHA BALIKA VIDYAPEETH

MAZDIA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY/ HEADMASTER

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM

PIN-781305.

7:GITUWAR RAHMAN

S/O- LATE ABDUL MALIK ALI ALIAS ABDUL KHALEK ALI

R/O VILLAGE- GAREMARI

MAUZA- SARUKHETRI

P/O- PASCHIM MAZDIA

DISTRICT- BARPETA

ASSAM

PIN-781305

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Hoque, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B.J. Talukdar, Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. P.K. Medhi, Govt. Advocate Ms. G. Hazarika, Standing Counsel BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 28.08.2026

Heard Mr. S. Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. B.J. Talukdar, the learned Senior Government Advocate assisted by Mr. P.K. Medhi, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, appears on behalf of the respondent No. 1.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners assailing an order passed by the Additional District Commissioner (Revenue), Barpeta dated 26.12.2025 whereby the mutation granted in favour of the petitioners was cancelled.

3. It is the opinion of this Court that an appeal lies to the learned Assam Board of Revenue in terms with Section 147(a) of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 against the order passed by the District Commissioner.

4. Considering the above, as the petitioners have an effective and alternative remedy, it is the opinion of this Court that the petitioners should be relegated to the learned Assam Board of Revenue for filing an appeal against the order dated 26.12.2025.

5. It is also very pertinent to observe that as this Court has relegated the petitioners to the learned Assam Board of Revenue and apparently the period for filing the appeal is over, an opportunity has to be granted to the petitioners to file the appeal.

6. Accordingly, this Court directs that if the petitioners file the appeal within a period of 30 days from today, the learned Assam Board of Revenue shall entertain the said appeal without insisting on the period of limitation.

7. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

8. With the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead