Gauhati High Court
AB/1629/2026 of HABIBUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 27 August 2026
GAHC010148582026 2026:GAU-AS:12431 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1629/2026 HABIBUR RAHMAN S/O TOMEJ UDDIN, R/O VILL. NO. 1 GARUGAON, P.S. BONGAIGAON, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010148582026
2026:GAU-AS:12431
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1629/2026
HABIBUR RAHMAN
S/O TOMEJ UDDIN, R/O VILL. NO. 1 GARUGAON, P.S. BONGAIGAON, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 28-08-2026 Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional PP for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for granting of pre-arrest bail to the Page No.# 2/2 petitioner namely, Habibur Rahman, in connection with Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 133/2026 under Sections 305(c)/318(3)/317(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The petitioner was granted interim bail vide order dated 21.07.2026, with conditions.
4. The case diary has been received.
5. The learned Additional PP submits that the petitioner had appeared before the IO and rendered his cooperation, his statement has also been recorded and the investigation has also progressed.
6. Under the circumstances, there is not necessity for cancelling the interim pre-arrest bail and is accordingly made absolute subject to the conditions that:-
(i) He shall render full cooperation to the remaining investigation;
(ii) He shall not hamper or tamper with evidence.
7. The anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of.
8. Return the CD.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant