Gauhati High Court
WA/309/2026 of SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 27 August 2026
GAHC010177152026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/309/2026 SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA SON OF JAMIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA, VILLAGE BORKHOLA PART-I, P.O. BORKHOLA, P.S. BORKHOLA, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788110 VERSUS 1. THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010177152026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/309/2026
SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA
SON OF JAMIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA, VILLAGE BORKHOLA PART-I, P.O.
BORKHOLA, P.S. BORKHOLA, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788110
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE ASSAM BAL BHAWAN UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1 3:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER CACHAR SILCHAR P.O. SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 4:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER CACHAR P.O. BORKHOLA DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAMPIN-78811 For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Gayatri Goswami, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. H.I. Choudhury, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam.
Page No.# 2/2 –B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
28.08.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)
After some arguments, Ms. Gayatri Goswami, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal in order to enable the appellant to prefer a review petition before the learned Single Judge for clarification with respect to the observation made in para 13 of the judgment impugned. The permission is granted. The present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE CHIEF
JUSTICE Comparing Assistant