Gauhati High Court

AB/1383/2026 of SRI SHANKAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 26 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010126212026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1383/2026 SRI SHANKAR DAS SON OF SRI JAYDEB DASRESIDENT OF JOYMATI NAGAR,WARD NO.1, MARIANI GRANTUNDER MARIANI POLICE STATIONIN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT,ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010126212026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1383/2026

SRI SHANKAR DAS

SON OF SRI JAYDEB DASRESIDENT OF JOYMATI NAGAR,WARD NO.1, MARIANI GRANTUNDER MARIANI POLICE STATIONIN THE DISTRICT OF

JORHAT,ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM

2:SRI JAYANTA DUTTA

SON OF SRI MEGHNATH DUTTA RESIDENT OF JOYMOTI NAGAR

WARD NO.1

MARIANI

JORHAT UNDER MARIANI POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF JORHAT

ASSAM (INFORMANT

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B M CHOUDHURY, MR. U CHOUDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, P SHARMA (R2),MS. R DEVI (R2),MR. P S BISWAS

(R2),MS. K L R YANTHAN (R2),MR. S C BISWAS (R2)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 27.08.2026 Heard Mr. B. M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. and Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. Also heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned Page No.# 2/2 counsel for the respondent No. 2.

2. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has submitted that the investigation is culminated in the charge sheet vide C.S. No. 60/2026, dated 05.06.2026.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is on interim bail vide order dated 14.07.2026 in connection with Mariani P.S. Case No. 32/2026 under Sections 74/75/76/137 of BNS, 2023 read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

4. Since the charge sheet has been submitted, there is no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner by the Investigating authority.

5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is closed.

6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach before the learned Trial Court on receipt of summons and pray for regular bail.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead