Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./1907/2026 of IMRAN ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 26 August 2026
GAHC010141632026 2026:GAU-AS:12369 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1907/2026 IMRAN ALI SON OF LT. KHABIR ALI, RESIDENT OF BANGAON, P.S. RANGIA DISTRICT- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE
GAHC010141632026
2026:GAU-AS:12369
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1907/2026
IMRAN ALI
SON OF LT. KHABIR ALI, RESIDENT OF BANGAON, P.S. RANGIA DISTRICT- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM, GUWAHATI.
Advocate for the Petitioner : S KAUR, L BANIK,N NEOG
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 27-08-2026 Heard Ms. L. Banik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. KK Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Imran Ali, seeking bail in connection with Rangia Police Station Case No. 143/2026, registered under Sections 61(2)/196(1)(a)/118(2)/109(1)/308(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The contents of the FIR reveal that a fight had ensued upon a request being made by the informant to remove certain photographs of deities from the Dhaba of one of the accused. The allegations are that in the ensuing fight, the informant was harmed, and some material of value had possibly been taken away from him. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that one of the accused has been granted bail by this Court on 25.08.2026, in AB No. 1532/2026. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has submitted that the Case Diary has been received. He has assisted the Court in pursuing the same and, in my considered opinion, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners involved in this Bail petition is not required at this moment.
Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 15.07.2026 is hereby made absolute. The bail granted shall be subject to the condition that the petitioner shall continue to participate in the investigation process as and when required to do so. Accordingly, this Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant