Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./2460/2026 of SRI NIDOR RANJAN AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010181832026 2026:GAU-AS:12227 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2460/2026 SRI NIDOR RANJAN AND ANR S/O. NIDO SALA, R/O. VILLAGE B/O, P.S. KOLAPTUKAR, DISTRICT KAMLEY, ARUNACHAL PRADESH. 2: TAMIN ORANG S/O. SRI BIPIN

GAHC010181832026

2026:GAU-AS:12227

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./2460/2026

SRI NIDOR RANJAN AND ANR

S/O. NIDO SALA, R/O. VILLAGE B/O, P.S. KOLAPTUKAR, DISTRICT

KAMLEY, ARUNACHAL PRADESH.

2: TAMIN ORANG

S/O. SRI BIPIN ORANG R/O. VILLAGE PATHALIPAM

RUPOHI

P.S. BOGINADI

DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 26-08-2026 Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional PP for the State.

2. Invoking section 483 BNSS, the petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Boginadi PS Case No. 82/2026 under section 61(2) BNS read with Section 13(1) (a) of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

3. Both the petitioners were arrested on 03.08.2026.

4. The case arose out of an FIR dated 03.08.2026 lodged by one Abhijit Gogoi. It is alleged that an information was received about carrying of beef meat and thereupon, the police personnel went out in civil dress. Subsequently, the two petitioners were found in the bike bearing registration No. ASO7T4143 and upon being apprehended 11.602 kgs of beef in 11 black colour polythene bags were found and seized.

5. It appears from the FIR and is also submitted by the learned counsel, one of the petitioners is from Kamley district of Arunachal Pradesh and the other petitioner is from Lakhimpur district of Assam. The investigation will have to determine whether the alleged act of the petitioners are in violation of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

6. Nevertheless, I am of the considered view that bail can be considered at this stage, though the learned Additional PP has opposed to the same contending that considering the quantity, it is suspected that the beef meat was for sale in the area.

7. Accordingly, in the given facts and circumstances, the petitioners are allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond or Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with one surety each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Lakhimpur and subject to the conditions that :-

(i) they shall cooperate with the investigation;

(ii) they shall not hamper or tamper with evidence;

(iii) they shall not commit any activities violative of Assam Cattle Preservation Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

8. The bail petition stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead