Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2214/2026 of DEEP JYOTI ALIAS DIPJYOTI BARMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 25 August 2026
GAHC010163992026 2026:GAU-AS:12257 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2214/2026 DEEP JYOTI ALIAS DIPJYOTI BARMAN SON OF NRIPENDRA NATH BARMAN, RESIDENT OF JYOTIKUCHI, POSAUKUCHI, PS-DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (M),
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010163992026
2026:GAU-AS:12257
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2214/2026
DEEP JYOTI ALIAS DIPJYOTI BARMAN
SON OF NRIPENDRA NATH BARMAN, RESIDENT OF JYOTIKUCHI, POSAUKUCHI, PS-DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781040
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, FOREST
DEPARTMENT, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D CHOUDHURY, MS. A KHARBANI,MR. R K SARMA,MR J
DAS,MR T CHAKRABORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : SPECIAL PP ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26.08.2026 Heard Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Gogoi learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page No.# 2/2 Sanhita, 2023 whereby the petitioner, Deep Jyoti @ Dipjyoti Barman has prayed for releasing him on bail after he was arrested in connection with Offence No. SP/30/2026-27 under Section 39/48A/49(B) read with Section 2(2) (14)(20)(31) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
3. Mr. D. Gogoi, learned Special Public Prosecutor, Wildlife has produced before this Court the report of the forensic examination, which reveals that the seized article is not a rhino horn.
4. In view of the above, I am of the considered view that the petitioners named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with a local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M).
5. Bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant