Gauhati High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/263/2023 of ANURUMA DAS Vs RAKESH KUMAR, I.A.S. AND 3 ORS. on 25 August 2026
GAHC010084262023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/263/2023 ANURUMA DAS W/O- SRI DALIM DAS, RESIDENT OF HOWLY, WARD NO. 01, P.O.- HOWLY, P.S. BARPETA, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAYANPUR,
GAHC010084262023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/263/2023
ANURUMA DAS
W/O- SRI DALIM DAS,
RESIDENT OF HOWLY, WARD NO. 01,
P.O.- HOWLY, P.S. BARPETA,
DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NAYANPUR, GANESHGURI, GUWAHATI-05, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
VERSUS
RAKESH KUMAR, I.A.S. AND 3 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTING THE STATE OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-5, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
2:AAYUSH GARG
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BARPETA
P.O. BARPETA
ASSAM.
3:MANAS JYOTI DAS
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE
BARPETA
ASSAM.
4:RAKESH AGARWAL
THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE
HOUSEFED COMPLEX
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-05
P.O.- DISPUR
DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I C DEKA, MR. D J SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P N GOSWAMI (r-1), MR. I BORTHAKUR SC, PHE
DEPT,MR. R R Gogoi(R-4),MR. P N GOSWAMI (R-4),MR. D GOGOI (r-1),MS. M KALITA (r-1)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
26.08.2026
Heard Shri I.C. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri R.R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. Shri Gogoi, the learned counsel has however submitted that the order dated 03.06.2022 passed in the concerned WP(C)/576/2021 has been complied with. In this regard, he has placed before this Court the written instructions. Shri Deka, the learned counsel for the petitioner has raised an issue that the respondents had taken about two years to comply with the order. Though the same may be relevant, considering the nature of the dispute and the fact that compliance has after all been done, this Court is of the opinion that there is no further requirement to continue with the contempt petition Accordingly the contempt petition stands closed. The written instructions along with the enclosed papers are made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant