Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2839/2026 of SANAM BEGUM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 25 August 2026
GAHC010172672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2839/2026 SANAM BEGUM DAUGHTER OF LATE SOLEMAN ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL-KHENA ALIBARI UNDER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE, DISTRICT-KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781131. VERSUS
GAHC010172672026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2839/2026
SANAM BEGUM
DAUGHTER OF LATE SOLEMAN ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL-KHENA
ALIBARI UNDER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE, DISTRICT-KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781131.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI- 781006
2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP
AMINGAON PIN-781031
3:CO- DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
PALASHBARI CO - DISTRICT
MIRZA
KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN-781125
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE MIRZA
PIN-781125
5:SRI BALENDRA CHANDRA THAKURIA
SON OF LATE BANGSHIDHAR THAKURIA
A RESIDENT OF VILL DHARAPUR
KHANAMUKH
P.O. DHARAPUR
P.S.- AZARA
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-78101
Linked Case : WP(C)/3952/2026
SANAM BEGUM
DAUGHTER OF LATE SOLEMAN ALI
A RESIDENT OF VILL-KHENA ALIBARI
UNDER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE
DISTRICT-KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN-781131.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-781006.
2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP
AMINGAONPIN-781031
3:CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE CO-DISTRICTCOMMISSIONER
PALASHBARI O -DISTRICT
MIRZA
KAMRUP
ASSAM
PIN-781125
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLEMIRZA
PIN-781125
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. K. Bhuyan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Sarmah, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Ms. G. Hazarika, SC, Revenue
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
26.08.2026
This is an application filed for impleading the Opposite Party No.5 as the Respondent No.5 in the accompanying writ petition. It is relevant to take note of that the Opposite Party No.5 is admittedly the landowner wherein the Petitioner/the Applicant is residing.
2. In the opinion of this Court, the instant application is misconceived in as much as the Opposite Party No.5 cannot be impleaded as the Respondent in the accompanying writ petition. At best, the Opposite Party No.5 can file a separate application seeking impleadment as a co-Petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the instant application stands rejected as being misconceived.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant