Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4540/2026 of MAJEDA KHATUN AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010177532026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4540/2026 MAJEDA KHATUN AND ORS ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM KHATONIAPARA GAON PANCHAYAT W/O.- IBRAHIM ALI IBRAHIM ALI PRADHANI A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HIRAPARA,

GAHC010177532026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4540/2026

MAJEDA KHATUN AND ORS

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM KHATONIAPARA GAON

PANCHAYAT W/O.- IBRAHIM ALI IBRAHIM ALI PRADHANI A RESIDENT OF

VILLAGE- HIRAPARA, P.O.- DHULA, DIST.- DARRANG, ASSAM.

2: INAMUL HAQUE

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM BAHBARI GAON PANCHAYAT

S/O.- ABU TALEB A RESIDENT OF VILL.- BAHBARI

P.O.- KHARUPETIA DIST.- DARRANG

3: ARJINARA BEGUM

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM NAGAZAN GAON PANCHAYAT A

RESIDENT OF VILL.- NIZ. BARUAJHAR

P.O.KUWARIPUKHURI

DARRANG

ASSAM.

4: KHAIRUL ISLAM

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM SHYAMTILA GOAN PANCHAYAT

S/O.- AMSER ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL.-NO. 1 DHANSHIRI KASH

P.O.- SHYAMTILA

P.S.- DHULA

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784190

5: JIARUL HOQUE

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM BALABARI GAON PANCHAYAT

S/O.-SULEMAN HOQUE A RESIDENT OF VILL.- NO. 2 THEKERABARI

P.O. -DHULA

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784146

6: NARZIMA BEGUM

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM SHERPUR GOAN PANCHAYAT

W/O.- MAFIJUL HOQUE A RESIDENT OF VILL.- BAGDIA

P.O.- DHULA

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784190

7: CHAINA KHATUN

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM DHARIAKHAITI GOAN

PANCHAYAT W/O.- PARAN ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL.- APARIA N.C.

P.O.- MANGALDAI

P.S.- MANGALDAI

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN784125.

8: SAMIRON NESSA

ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT MEMBER FROM NANGLI GAON PANCHAYAT

W/O- SHAHIL ALI A RESIDENT OF NO.3 NANGLI

P.O.- MANGALDOI

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784125

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

DARRANG

MANGALDAI

DISTDARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784125

3:THE DARRANG ZILLA PARISHAD

MANGALDOI TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN

P.O- MANGALDOI

DISTDARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784125

4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DARRANG

ZILLA PARISHAD

MANGALDOI

DIST- DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN-784125

5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DALGAON - SIALMARI ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT

KHARUPETIA

DIST.- DARRANG

ASSAM.

6:MUSTAK AHMED

S/O- MUSLIMMUDDIN AHMED VILL-KHETASWAR

P.O- KHARUPETIA DIST-DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN7.

7:RUSTAM ALI

S/O- IT. SAMSU HAQUE VILL-ALIKASH

P.O- GHANSIMULI DIST-DARRANG

ASSAM

PIN8.

8:NUR HUSSAIN

S/O- LT. JAINUDDIN VILL- KHARUPETIA WARD NO. 2 P.O- KHARUPETIA

DIST-DARRANG ASSAM

PIN

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S. ALOM, MR N Z CHOUDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. M HUSSAIN(R8),FOR CAVEATOR,MR. K

KALITA,MR. A SARMA,SC, P AND R.D.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

26.08.2026 Heard Shri A. R. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri S. Alom, learned counsel for the petitioners who has put to challenge the action of the

Darrang Zilla Parishad in making temporary settlement of 3 markets. The primary ground of challenge is that for settlement the value of which is less than Rs. 10 lakhs, the jurisdiction would lie on the concerned Anchalik Parishad. Also heard Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD and Shri A. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 8 who has filed a Vakalatnama. At the outset, this Court has noticed that the cause of action which has been sought to be raised is primarily of the Anchalik Panchayat. Though the petitioners claim to be the members of the Anchalik Panchayat as well as the Standing Committee, in the opinion of this Court, the aggrieved party to espouse the cause of action has to be the concerned Anchalik Panchayat. At this stage, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh by the appropriate person. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead