Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4568/2026 of ABDUL KALAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 25 August 2026
GAHC010179712026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4568/2026 ABDUL KALAM S/O ABDUL MAZID, R/O JHAGRARPAR PART III, P.O. JHAGRARPAR, P.S. DHUBRI, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN CODE 783325. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010179712026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4568/2026
ABDUL KALAM
S/O ABDUL MAZID, R/O JHAGRARPAR PART III, P.O. JHAGRARPAR, P.S.
DHUBRI, DISTRICT DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN CODE 783325.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DHUBRI
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN CODE 783301.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
BILASIPARA
PIN CODE 783348
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
4:THE SUB REGISTRAR
BILASIPARA
DISTRICT DHUBRI
ASSAM
PIN CODE- 78330
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S RAHMAN, MS. S PHUKAN
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26.08.2026 Mr. S. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file afresh. Mr. J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1 and Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant