Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2258/2026 of SOHIDUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 August 2026
GAHC010164742026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2258/2026 SOHIDUL ISLAM S/O NAZIM UDDIN VILLAGE GOROIMARI SATRA, P.S. GOROIMARI, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate
GAHC010164742026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2258/2026
SOHIDUL ISLAM
S/O NAZIM UDDIN
VILLAGE GOROIMARI SATRA, P.S. GOROIMARI, DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, MR A ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR A SHARMA(INFORMANT)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25-08-2026 Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional PP for the State and Mr. A. Sharma, learned counsel for the informant.
2. Invoking section 483 BNSS, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Chhaygaon PS Case No. 121/2026 under section 87 BNS.
3. The case arose out of an FIR dated 10.06.2026 alleging that on 06.06.2026, in the late evening, the informant’s daughter left for one educational institution but went missing. Thereafter, he received a phone call from one number asking for her Aadhaar card. As per the forwarding report, forwarding the arrested person, Sohidul Islam, stated to be about 21 years, the girl has been recovered and as per the order dated 06.07.2026, passed by the learned Magistrate the statement of the victim girl under section 183 BNSS has also been recorded.
4. Mr. Sharma, learned Amicus Curiae, representing the informant submits that it is a case of elopement and the parties have settled the matter and the informant does not oppose the bail.
5. The petitioner having been arrested on 01.07.2026 is stated to have completed 56 (fifty six) days in under trial detention and the applicable statutory period is 60 (sixty) days.
6. In the given facts and circumstances, the grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner shall be allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup, Amingaon, subject to the further conditions that:-
(i) He shall cooperate with the remaining investigation;
(ii) He shall not cause any harassment, harm or intimidation to the victim in any manner.
8. Violation of any of the bail conditions would entail cancellation of the bail.
9. Bail petition stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant