Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2280/2026 of SRI PRABIN NATH ALIAS TAPAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 24 August 2026
GAHC010167682026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2280/2026 SRI PRABIN NATH ALIAS TAPAN SON OF SRI PRAFULLA BORA ALIAS KAN NATH RESIDENT OF BALIGAON KHARKATI PO KHARKATI PS PANIGAON DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010167682026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2280/2026
SRI PRABIN NATH ALIAS TAPAN
SON OF SRI PRAFULLA BORA ALIAS KAN NATH RESIDENT OF BALIGAON
KHARKATI PO KHARKATI PS PANIGAON DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:MRS. LERELI BANIA
W/O SRI NIGANI BANIA
VILL- JURKHAT BANIAGAON
P.O.PANIGAON
DIST. LAKHIMPUR
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N P DOWERAH, MR S SARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.08.2026
1. Heard Mr. N.P. Dowerah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for Page No.# 2/2 granting bail to the petitioner, who has been in judicial custody since 11.12.2025 in connection with Panigaon P.S. Case No. 87/2025), registered under Sections 329 (4)/ 65 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
3. The scanned copy of the TCR has been received. I have perused the same.
4. The trial is proceeding at the correct pace and there are implications against the petitioner.
5. At the present stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail petition is rejected at this stage.
6. Bail application is dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant