Gauhati High Court

AB/1532/2026 of JAINUR ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010140162026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1532/2026 JAINUR ALI S/O LATE ASHAN ALI, R/O BANGAON, P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010140162026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1532/2026

JAINUR ALI

S/O LATE ASHAN ALI, R/O BANGAON, P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS, JANIFAR RAHMAN,MR. I U CHOWDHURY

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 25.08.2026 Heard Mr. I.U. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The petitioner has been granted interim bail on 07.07.2026, taking into consideration the fact that four other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court.

Page No.# 2/2 Today, the case diary is not available. The allegation against the petitioner is that the informant had lodged an FIR naming 9 accused, including the petitioner, alleging that they had put up some photographs of deities of the Hindu religion in his hotel and, when the informant asked them to remove the same, they did not do so. In the circumstances, I do not find that custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is necessary. Accordingly, the interim order dated 07.07.2026 is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner continues to participate in and cooperate with the investigation. In the event of failure of the petitioner to participate in and cooperate with the investigation process, the interim bail granted to the petitioner shall be liable to be recalled/cancelled. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead