Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./2301/2026 of MAHIDUL ISLAM ALIAS MOHIDUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 August 2026
GAHC010166932026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2301/2026 MAHIDUL ISLAM ALIAS MOHIDUL ISLAM SON OF LATE ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKATLIJAR ALIAS KATLIJHAR, POLICE STATION- HOWLY, DISTRICT-BARPETA,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010166932026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./2301/2026
MAHIDUL ISLAM ALIAS MOHIDUL ISLAM
SON OF LATE ABDUL MAJID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKATLIJAR ALIAS
KATLIJHAR, POLICE STATION- HOWLY, DISTRICT-BARPETA, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MR A HAI,A RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.08.2026 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of bail to the accused Mahidul Islam @ Mohidul Islam in connection with Barpeta Road Police Station Case No.72/2026 registered under Sections Page No.# 2/2 179/180 of the BNS 2023 read with Section 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation has culminated in Charge Sheet No. 80/2023 dated 14.08.2023.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since all material evidence has been collected and the charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner may be allowed the privilege of bail at this stage and to participate in the trial as and when summoned.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has objected to the bail application. However, on consideration of the circumstances, I am of the view that the petitioner can be allowed the privilege of bail till the receipt of summons to face the trial.
6. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with a local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta.
7. The petitioner shall, during the period of bail, not be involved in any offence of similar nature and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta, without obtaining prior written permission.
8. The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court as and when summons are received and pray for regular bail. With the above observation and direction, the bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant