Gauhati High Court
AB/1705/2026 of AJOY KR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 24 August 2026
GAHC010154522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1705/2026 AJOY KR SINGH S/O BHARAT CH DAS, R/O KONCH GAON, NEAR SOCIAL FOREST OFFICE, BISWANATH CHARIALI, P.S. BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010154522026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1705/2026
AJOY KR SINGH
S/O BHARAT CH DAS, R/O KONCH GAON, NEAR SOCIAL FOREST OFFICE, BISWANATH CHARIALI, P.S. BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY HEREIN BY ITS PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K MAHAJAN, MR. U S BORA,MR A CHOWDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Kataky, learned Special Public Prosecutor and Senior counsel assisted by Ms. A. Lala, learned counsel for the State. By the order dated 28.07.2026, this Court had directed that till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the present petitioner.
Page No.# 2/2 The learned senior counsel appeared as Special Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner has already appeared before the Investigating Authority and has submitted his assets and liabilities. In such view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that further custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary at this stage. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is closed directing that no coercive action shall be taken against the present petitioner in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No.11/2026 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall continue to participate in and cooperate with the investigation. In the event of failure to participate in or cooperate with the investigation, the bail granted to the petitioner shall be liable to be recalled/cancelled. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant