Gauhati High Court

Cont.Cas(C)/339/2026 of SAMEERA MAZUMDAR Vs DILIP KUMAR BORAH, IAS AND ANR on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010124782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/339/2026 SAMEERA MAZUMDAR D/O LT. A . K. MAZUMDAR, PRESENTLY POSTED AS SDO (IC) IN THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (DC), MORIGAON AT MORIGAON, ASSAM,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010124782026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/339/2026

SAMEERA MAZUMDAR

D/O LT. A. K. MAZUMDAR, PRESENTLY POSTED AS SDO (IC) IN THE

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER (DC), MORIGAON AT

MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782105

VERSUS

DILIP KUMAR BORAH, IAS AND ANR

THE SENIOR MOST SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

2:SMTI. REENA MECH

THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

JANATA BHAWAN

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S B CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R DHAR(R1), MS TOSHISENLA(R1),MR A BANERJEE(R1)

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 25.08.2026

Heard Ms. S. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that the order of this Court dated 20.05.2026 passed in WP(C)/2620/2026 have Page No.# 2/2 not been complied with and therefore, the contempt petition has been filed. Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that the order of this Court has been complied with by passing of the order dated 19.08.2026 by the Addl. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Transformation and Development Department. In support of his submission, he has produced a copy of the said order for perusal of this Court. On perusal of the same, it is seen that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and disposed of. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. A copy of the order dated 19.08.2026 is retained on record and marked as ‘x’ for identification.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead