Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/2245/2026 of NIBEDITA KALITA Vs SRI BIMAN BORAH AND 4 ORS. on 23 August 2026
GAHC010134332026 2026:GAU-AS:12078-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2245/2026 NIBEDITA KALITA D/O LATE DHIRENDRA NATH KALITA, RESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT AREA, T.V CENTRE, POC R BUILDING, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786003.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010134332026
2026:GAU-AS:12078-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2245/2026
NIBEDITA KALITA
D/O LATE DHIRENDRA NATH KALITA, RESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT
AREA, T.V CENTRE, POC R BUILDING, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786003.
VERSUS
SRI BIMAN BORAH AND 4 ORS.
S/O LATE BOGAI BORAH RESIDENT OF KALYANPUR, SEUJINAGAR, P.O- SILAPATHAR, DISTRICT- DHEMAJI, PIN-787059
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (A) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES
ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI- 781006.
4:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES
DIBRUGARH
ASSAM.
5:MD NURUL ISLAM
SENIOR ASSISTANT OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH
SERVICES
DIBRUGARH-78600
Advocate for the Petitioner : M BEGUM, MR. Y S MANNAN
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH AND F W, MR J LOTHA(R1),MR. H R DAS(R1),MR
H K SARMA(R1),MR B D DAS(R1),MS. S K LASKAR(R5),MR M HUSSAIN(R5),MR. A K
AZAD(R5),MR. N HAQUE(R5)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-08-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the applicant, prays for condoning the delay of 57 days in filing the appeal against the impugned Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2026 passed in WP(C) 5275/2025. Mr. B.D. Das, learned Sr. Counsel for the respondent No.1 and Ms. S.K. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5 submit that they have got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 57 days is condoned. The I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant