Gauhati High Court
AB/1579/2026 of ABDUR ROHIM ALIAS RAHUL Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 August 2026
GAHC010144012026 2026:GAU-AS:12116 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1579/2026 ABDUR ROHIM ALIAS RAHUL SON OF AZIJUL HOQUE RESIDENT OF IG ROADWARD NO. 13 POLICE STATION- DHUBRI DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010144012026
2026:GAU-AS:12116
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1579/2026
ABDUR ROHIM ALIAS RAHUL
SON OF AZIJUL HOQUE RESIDENT OF IG ROADWARD NO. 13 POLICE
STATION- DHUBRI DISTRICT- DHUBRI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M AHMED, MR A HAI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-08-2026 Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional PP for the State.
2. Invoking section 482 BNSS, the petitioner herein stated to be the brother-in-law of the informant cum victim is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bilasipara PS Case No. 200/2026 under section 69/308(4)/3(5) BNS.
3. The case resulted in a chargesheet after completion of the investigation and is presently stated to be pending at the stage of appearance awaiting committal. The 3 (three) accused persons named in the FIR are the husband, brother-in-law (petitioner) and father-in-law.
4. The informant/victim has alleged about being demanded of several lakhs of rupees by the accused persons for solemnization of marriage with the accused No. 1. The specific allegation with regard to the present petitioner is that on 05.04.2026, he tried to commit rape upon her and the FIR was lodged on 11.06.2026. It is submitted that the accused No. 1, who is the husband of the informant was arrested and subsequently granted bail by this Court.
5. Scanned TCR is available.
6. Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel draws attention to the statement of the victim/informant recorded under section 183 BNSS before the learned Magistrate and further submits that there is variation in her statement vis- a-vis the FIR.
7. Upon perusing the statement, I find that therein she has stated about the present petitioner committing bad act upon her.
8. The learned Additional PP objects to the grant of bail.
9. I have given my consideration to the matter. Since the case is poised for commencement of Trial and to avoid any delay due to any abscondance of the accused persons, I am inclined to consider the prayer for bail, subject however to suitable conditions.
10. In such view of the matter, in the event of his arrest in connection with the aforementioned case, he shall be released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, and subject to the further conditions that:-
(i) he shall be available for trial;
(ii) he shall appear before the learned Court below on the next and subsequent dates;
(iii) he shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence;
(iv) he shall not cause any harm to the victim/informant in any manner;
11. Violation of any of the conditions would entail cancellation of the bail.
12. The petitioner upon appearance before the learned court below may submit fresh bail bond whereupon necessary orders may be passed.
13. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant