Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4882/2022 of ABDUL JALIL AND 3 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. on 23 August 2026
GAHC010146042022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2022 ABDUL JALIL AND 3 ORS. S/O- ABDUL JABBAR, VILLAGE- KAPNARPAR, P.O.- PECHALA, DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN 2: ISLAM UDDIN S/O- LATE MAKMAD ALI VILLAGE-
GAHC010146042022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2022
ABDUL JALIL AND 3 ORS.
S/O- ABDUL JABBAR,
VILLAGE- KAPNARPAR,
P.O.- PECHALA,
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN
2: ISLAM UDDIN
S/O- LATE MAKMAD ALI
VILLAGE- BIHAIRDALA
P.O.- LEELACHILA
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788734.
3: MONSUR AHMED
S/O ANOYAR ALI
VILLAGE- JAGANNATHPUR
P.O.- LEELACHILA
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788734.
4: SAFIQUE UDDIN
SON OF ANWAR ALI
VILLAGE- SONAIRPAR
P.O. ANIPUR
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE COMMISSIONER
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ASSAM
PANJABARI
JURIPAR
GUWAHATI-37.
3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
KARIMGANJ ZILLA PARISHAD
P.O. KARIMGANJ
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788710.
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARIMGANJ
P.O. KARIMGANJ
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788710.
5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
DULLAVCHERRA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
P.O.- DULLAVCHERRA
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788736.
6:PATIALA GAON PANCHAYAT
VILLAGE- PATIALA
P.O.- PECHALA
DISTRICT KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
7:THE PRESIDENT
PATIALA GAON PANCHAYAT
VILLAGE- PATIALA
P.O. PECHALA
DISTRICT- KARIMGANJ
ASSAM
PIN- 788734
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED, MR. A K AZAD,MR K UDDIN
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24.08.2026
Mr. K. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. P. Thapa, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD Department for the respondent nos. 1 – 3, 5 & 6; and Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 4 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant