Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4006/2026 of BADIUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010156352026 2026:GAU-AS:12295 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4006/2026 BADIUR RAHMAN S/O LATE ABDUL QUADIR,R/O VILLAGE- DAULATPUR, P.O. DAULATPUR, PIN 787054P.S. BIHPURIA,DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010156352026

2026:GAU-AS:12295

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4006/2026

BADIUR RAHMAN

S/O LATE ABDUL QUADIR,R/O VILLAGE- DAULATPUR, P.O. DAULATPUR, PIN 787054P.S. BIHPURIA,DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF

ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006

ASSAM

3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

LAKHIMPUR

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. NORTH LAKHIMPUR

PIN -787001DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

LAKHIMPUR ZILLA PARISHAD

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. NORTH LAKHIMPUR

PIN -787001DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

5:THE LAKHIMPUR ZILLA PARISHAD

REPRESENTED BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Page No.# 2/2

NORTH LAKHIMPUR

P.O. NORTH LAKHIMPUR

PIN -787001DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSAM

6:SRI ANANTA GOGOI

S/O- LT. BOMBBESWAR GOGOI

R/O VILL.- MENEHA

P.O. LALUK

PIN- 784160P.S. LALUK

DIST. LAKHIMPUR

ASSA

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. Borgohain, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dutta, SC, P&RD

: Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. GA, Assam

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24.08.2026

Mr. B. Borgohain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.

2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.

3. Interim order passed if any, stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead