Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2844/2026 of MD IDRISH ALI Vs SRI BISWAJIT PEGU AND ORS on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010175972026 2026:GAU-AS:12072 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2844/2026 MD IDRISH ALI S/O MD. DANESH ALI, R/O VILL- BHAIRAGHOL, P.O. JOYSAGAR, PIN 781126, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS SRI BISWAJIT PEGU AND ORS THE

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010175972026

2026:GAU-AS:12072

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2844/2026

MD IDRISH ALI

S/O MD. DANESH ALI, R/O VILL- BHAIRAGHOL, P.O. JOYSAGAR, PIN

781126, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM

VERSUS

SRI BISWAJIT PEGU AND ORS

THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM

2:SRI PRASANTA KUMAR BHUYAN

THE CHIEF CONTROLLER

VILLAGE DEFENCE ORGANIZATION

ASSAM GUWAHATI-08

3:SMTI SUPRIYA DAS

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

NALBARI

PIN-781335

ASSAM

4:SRI DIGANTA BORA

IPS

THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

HOME DEPARTMENT

DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

5:SRI BIBEKANANDA DAS

THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

NALBARI

PIN-781335

ASSA

Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S G BARUAH, MR. S SAIKIA,MR. B BORGOHAIN,MR. S

NEOG

Advocate for the Respondent : MR D NATH, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24.08.2026

Heard Ms. S. G. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks for impleadment of Sri. Diganta Bora, IPS, who is the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Home Department and Sri Bibekananda Das, Senior Superintendant of Police, Nalbari as the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. She submits that the two persons are the new incumbents holding the said posts and therefore, the impleadment is necessary for effective compliance of the Court’s direction. Mr. D. J. Boro, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and submits that he has no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the application seeking impleadment of the parties concerned is hereby allowed. I.A. stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead