Gauhati High Court

AB/1126/2026 of ALTAF HUSSAIN ALIAS RAJU AND 6 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010101062026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1126/2026 ALTAF HUSSAIN ALIAS RAJU AND 6 ORS. S/O MOSTOKIN ALI, R/O VILL BAZARGHAT, PS PATHARKANDI, DIST SRIBHUMI, ASSAM 2: ANAM UDDIN S/O MOSTOKIN ALI R/O VILL

GAHC010101062026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/1126/2026

ALTAF HUSSAIN ALIAS RAJU AND 6 ORS.

S/O MOSTOKIN ALI, R/O VILL BAZARGHAT, PS PATHARKANDI, DIST

SRIBHUMI, ASSAM

2: ANAM UDDIN

S/O MOSTOKIN ALI

R/O VILL BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSAM

3: SALIK UDDIN

S/O MOSTOKIN ALI

R/O VILL BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSAM

4: SAHIN AHMED

S/O AMIR ALI

R/O VILL BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSAM

5: DIDARUL HOQUE

S/O LATE SUNA MIA

R/O VILL- BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSAM

6: MUJIB UDDIN

S/O LATE FAKAR UDDIN

R/O VILL BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSAM

7: ABDUL MONAF

S/O LATE RIYASAD ALI

R/O VILL BAZARGHAT

PS PATHARKANDI

DIST SRIBHUMI

ASSA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S NAG, MR. J RAHMAN,A RAHMAN,MR. N D SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the investigation has culminated in Charge-Sheet No.60/2026 dated 30.05.2026. Since the charge-sheet has been submitted, there appears to be no apprehension of arrest of the petitioner by the Investigating Authority. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail application is closed allowing the petitioner to appear and pray for appropriate relief, if as and when summons are received by the petitioners in the event they are sent up for trial.

Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead