Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3301/2026 of PRAFULL A KUMAR BORAH AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS on 23 August 2026
GAHC010034152026 2026:GAU-AS:12062 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3301/2026 PRAFULL A KUMAR BORAH AND ANR S/O LATE LAKSHMI NATH BORAH, VILL. NONOI TELIYA GAON OF SUTAR KISAMAT, P.O. NONOI, P.S. SADAR, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010034152026
2026:GAU-AS:12062
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3301/2026
PRAFULL A KUMAR BORAH AND ANR
S/O LATE LAKSHMI NATH BORAH, VILL. NONOI TELIYA GAON OF SUTAR
KISAMAT, P.O. NONOI, P.S. SADAR, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782101
2: PRADYUMNA KUMAR BORAH
S/O- LATE LAKSHMI NATH BORAH
VILL.- TELIYA GAON OF SUTAR KISAMAT
P.O. NONOI
P.S. SADAR
DIST. NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782101
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DISASTER DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM AT GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781006.
2:THE DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEYS (DLRS)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM-781032.
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)
NAGAON DISTRICT AT NAGAON
ASSAM-782001.
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
NAGAON CIRCLE FOR BARHANPUR MOUZA AT NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN- 782102
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P K BORAH, MR T T MONI
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.08.2026
Heard the petition-in-person [the petitioner no. 2] and Mr. T.T. Moni, learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Government of Assam for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. N. Goswami, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 3 & 4. After making submissions for some-time, the petitioner-in-person and Mr. Moni, learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 have submitted that they may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, in order to file two writ petitions separately. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant