Gauhati High Court
AB/1970/2026 of SHRI PARINDRA DAS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 23 August 2026
GAHC010173672026 2026:GAU-AS:12106 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1970/2026 SHRI PARINDRA DAS S/O DIJENDRA DAS R/O 191, SRIBANI, CHAMELA BAZAR, RAM KRISHNA NAGAR POLICE STATION, SRIBHUMI DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI, ASSAM,PIN -788166.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010173672026
2026:GAU-AS:12106
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1970/2026
SHRI PARINDRA DAS
S/O DIJENDRA DAS R/O 191, SRIBANI, CHAMELA BAZAR, RAM KRISHNA
NAGAR POLICE STATION, SRIBHUMI DISTRICT - SRIBHUMI, ASSAM,PIN
-788166.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N C DAS, MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,J BAISHYA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 24-08-2026 Heard Mr. NC Das, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. J. Baishya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. MP Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appears for the State.
Page No.# 2/2
2. This is a Bail Application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) for grant of Pre-arrest Bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S Case No. 20/2026 under Section 80(2) of B.N.S, registered pursuant to lodging of an F.I.R dated 05.04.2026.
3. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and the learned Senior counsel submits that the husband of the deceased had been granted default bail by the Judicial Magistrate First Class on 13.07.2026, since the charge sheet had not been submitted within 90 days of detention in judicial custody.
4. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted vide CS No. 59/2026 dated 27.07.2026.
5. On consideration of the materials placed before this Court, there does not seem to be any apprehension or requirement of the Investigating Authority to arrest the petitioner herein, since the charge sheet has already been submitted.
6. Accordingly, this petition is closed providing that the petitioner would appear before the Trial Court, if and when summons are received in the event the petitioner is put for Trial.
7. Anticipatory Bail Application is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant