Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4491/2026 of FAKRUL ISLAM KHANDKAR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS on 20 August 2026
GAHC010171142026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4491/2026 FAKRUL ISLAM KHANDKAR SON OF LATE FAZLUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 100, ANUPAM NAGAR, P.O. AND P.S- HATIGAON, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM. VERSUS THE
GAHC010171142026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4491/2026
FAKRUL ISLAM KHANDKAR
SON OF LATE FAZLUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 100, ANUPAM
NAGAR, P.O. AND P.S- HATIGAON, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PWD (BLDG) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6.
2:THE DIRECTOR
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM. HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI-36.
3:THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
ASSAM
SIXMILE
GUWAHATI-22.
4:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (B) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
5:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PWD
ASSAM
CHANDMARI
GUWAHATI-03.
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (BLDG)
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-03.
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
P.W.D
GUWAHATI
BLDG. DIVISION NO. II
DISPUR
GHY-06.
8:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD
MEDICAL COLLAGE HOSPITAL
CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
FANCY BAZAR
KAMRUP M
GUWAHATI-01.
9:THE SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GHY-06
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S ISLAM, S RAHMAN,MR. R ISLAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH, SC, FINANCE,SC, PWD
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.08.2026 Heard Shri S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department and Shri M. Bhuyan, learned counsel representing PWD. By the present petition, the petitioner has expressed the grievance that an order dated 10.11.2025 passed by this Court in the earlier round of litigation, namely, WP(C)/6300/2025 has not been complied with. In the opinion of this
Court, such grievance cannot be raised by way of a writ petition. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file appropriate application. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant