Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2048/2020 of DIPANKAR DAS AND 2 ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. on 20 August 2026
GAHC010059792020 2026:GAU-AS:12052 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2048/2020 DIPANKAR DAS AND 2 ORS. S/O- LT. DEBENDRA DAS, RONGPUR PT-IV, KARATIGRAM, P.S. SILCHAR, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR. 2: AMIYA BHUSHAN CHOUDHURY S/O
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010059792020
2026:GAU-AS:12052
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2048/2020
DIPANKAR DAS AND 2 ORS.
S/O- LT. DEBENDRA DAS, RONGPUR PT-IV, KARATIGRAM, P.S. SILCHAR, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR.
2: AMIYA BHUSHAN CHOUDHURY
S/O HEMENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHURY
RONGPUR PT-IV
SANTIPARA
P.S. SILCHAR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR.
3: ABHISHEK GOSWAMI
S/O LT. ANUKUL CHANDRA GOSWAMI
NABAPALLY
P.S. SILCHAR
SILCHAR
DIST. CACHAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY.-
781006.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GUWAHATI- 781006.
3:DY. COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
SILCHAR (PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BRANCH).
Page No.# 2/2
4:THE DIRECTOR
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
GOVT.OF ASSAM. DISPUR
GUWAHATI- 781006.
5:SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD
REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN/ EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SILCHAR- 788001.
6:RANGPUR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REPRESENTED BY THE SECY.
P.S. SILCHAR (SADAR)
SILCHAR- 788809
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.K. Barooah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21.08.2026
Mr. V.K. Barooah, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition, therefore, stands closed as it has become infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant