Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/2317/2026 of JITUMONI BORUAH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010145052026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2317/2026 JITUMONI BORUAH SON OF SRI GIRISH BORUAH, VILLAGEMAHDHOWA, P.O.-GANDHIA TINIALI, DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR, PIN- 787058, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS

GAHC010145052026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2317/2026

JITUMONI BORUAH

SON OF SRI GIRISH BORUAH, VILLAGEMAHDHOWA, P.O.-GANDHIA

TINIALI, DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR, PIN- 787058, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006.

3:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-781019

4:THE STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ASSAM AS CHAIRMAN

GUWAHATI

PIN-781019

5:THE DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

MORIGAON

DISTRICT

PIN- 782001

ASSAM.

6:THE PRINCIPAL

MACHKHOWA DEGREE COLLEGE

DHEMAJI

PIN-787057

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M K SHARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 21.08.2026 Heard Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Higher Education Department.

2. By way of this interlocutory application, the applicant seeks correction of the cause title of WP(C)/3140/2026, as well as correction of certain typographical errors relating to the name of the college and the subject/post occupied by the petitioner.

3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that, due to inadvertence, while describing respondent No. 1 in the cause title, “Department of School Education” has been mentioned, whereas the same ought to have been described as “Department of Higher Education”. Similarly, the serial numbers of the respondents have been incorrectly typed as 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, which ought to be corrected as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively.

4. It is further submitted that the District Scrutiny Committee has also been incorrectly described in the cause title as “The District Scrutiny

Committee represented by its Chairman-cum-District Commissioner, Morigaon”, whereas the correct description ought to be “The District Scrutiny Committee represented by its Chairman-cum-District Commissioner, Dhemaji”.

5. Further, in paragraph Nos. 5, 13 and 14 of the writ petition, the name of the college has been incorrectly mentioned as “Madhya Kampeeth College, Borka”, whereas the same ought to be “Machkhowa Degree College, Dhemaji”. Likewise, the subject/post has been incorrectly mentioned as “Economics”, whereas the same ought to be “English”.

6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the pleadings, it appears that the errors pointed out in the cause title and in the name of the college and subject/post are inadvertent typographical errors. It is also noticed that the name of the college requires correction in paragraph Nos. 5, 11, 13 and 14 of the writ petition.

7. Accordingly, the aforesaid typographical errors in the connected writ petition stand corrected.

8. Let an amended writ petition, incorporating the corrections in terms of this order, be furnished to the Registry, along with a copy thereof to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

9. Resultantly, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead