Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2465/2025 of FAIZUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 19 August 2026
GAHC010097122025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2465/2025 FAIZUR RAHMAN S/O - LATE EYAR MAHMUD, R/O- TALTOLA, SATGAON, P.O. AND P.S. - SATGAON, PIN - 781027 DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010097122025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2465/2025
FAIZUR RAHMAN
S/O - LATE EYAR MAHMUD, R/O- TALTOLA, SATGAON, P.O. AND P.S. - SATGAON, PIN - 781027 DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI
-781006,
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
ASSAM
ULUBARI
GUWAHATI - 781007
ASSAM.
3:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
GUWAHATI
PANBAZAR
GUWAHATI - 781001
ASSAM
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
(ADMN)
GUWAHATI CUM DISCIPLINERY AUTHORITY
ASSAM
5:THE ADITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
(PCR) CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER
GUWAHATI
ASSA
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS A AFREEN, MR I RAFIQUE,MRS S A CHOUDHURY,N
CHAKRABORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-08-2026
Mr. I Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, since the departmental proceeding has been completed. Ms. S Baruah, learned State Counsel appearing for all the respondents agrees to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant