Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./1293/2026 of RUPAK SEN Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 19 August 2026
GAHC010093472026 2026:GAU-AS:11905 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1293/2026 RUPAK SEN SON OF SUNIL SEN RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.102, VIVEKANANDA PATH, GUWAHATI-34, P.S. DISPUR, P.O. ODALBAKRA, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM,
GAHC010093472026
2026:GAU-AS:11905
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./1293/2026
RUPAK SEN
SON OF SUNIL SEN
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.102, VIVEKANANDA PATH, GUWAHATI-34, P.S.
DISPUR, P.O. ODALBAKRA, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, MOBILE NO.
6001957323
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : A I AHMED, MS B DEVI,MR P SAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20.08.2026
Heard Mr. A.I. Ahmed, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam.
2. The case diary, called for, has been received along with the FSL report.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the deceased wife of the petitioner was suffering from severe diabetes prior to her death and that, on the unfortunate day, the wife of the petitioner had to be taken to the hospital in a very precarious condition, where she breathed her last.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although initially, there is a noting in the MLC as reflected in the grounds of notice, that the attending doctor had opined the cause of death to be poisoning, there is no such act done by the either the petitioner or his family members on the deceased wife, and she had died of natural causes arising out of her severe diabetes.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the FSL report does not indicate any poisoning or other such action to have been taken upon the deceased prior to her death, and there are no injury marks noted in the post-mortem report also.
6. In the above circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner, namely, Rupak Sen, who has already been enlarged on bail pursuant to the orders of this Court, is not required to be further kept in custody. Accordingly, the privilege of bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 25.06.2026 is hereby made absolute.
7. However, any observations made herein shall not affect the trial of the petitioner, if it so commences.
8. The Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant