Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/9424/2019 of MD. EBRAHIM ALI Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. on 19 August 2026
GAHC010313532019 2026:GAU-AS:11972 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/9424/2019 MD. EBRAHIM ALI S/O- LATE HUSSAIN ALI, R/O- ROSE GOLI AMOLAPATTY, P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010313532019
2026:GAU-AS:11972
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/9424/2019
MD. EBRAHIM ALI
S/O- LATE HUSSAIN ALI, R/O- ROSE GOLI AMOLAPATTY, P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI-1.
2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
HOME DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
NEW DELHI-01
INDIA
4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR
NRC
ASSAM
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DIBRUGARH
P.O. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH
ASSAM.
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B)
DIBRUGARH
P.O. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH
Page No.# 2/2
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M B U AHMED, B J BAROOAH
Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.08.2026 (K.R. Surana, J)
None appears on call for the petitioner. However, all the respondents are represented. The petitioner remained un-represented on 28.07.2026, and on the said date it is provided that in the event if the petitioner remains absent or un- represented, adverse order will follow. As the petitioner remained un-represented, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. The consequences of the impugned opinion shall follow. The Registry is directed to return back the records of the Tribunal along with a copy of this order to be made a part of the record by the said learned Tribunal.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant