Gauhati High Court
WA/365/2025 of MS EMPIRE INFRA PROJECTS Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 19 August 2026
GAHC010246822025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/365/2025 MS EMPIRE INFRA PROJECTS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR YOUSUF AMANULLA CHOUDHURY, ADDRESS NEHARS RESIDENCY, 5TH FLOOR, HATIGAON CHARIALI, PO AND PS HATIGAON,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010246822025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/365/2025
MS EMPIRE INFRA PROJECTS
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR YOUSUF AMANULLA CHOUDHURY, ADDRESS NEHARS RESIDENCY, 5TH FLOOR, HATIGAON CHARIALI, PO AND PS HATIGAON, GUWAHATI 38, DIST KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD HEALTH AND EDUCATION CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 3:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER H AND E PWD H AND E DEPARTMENT CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TB IV H AND E O/O CHIEF ENGINEER PWD H AND E ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI 3 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD SILCHAR UDHARBOND SONAI AND DHOLAI (SC) TERRITORIAL BUILDING DIVISION SILCHAR CACHAR PIN 78800 For the Appellant(s) : Mr. T. Sk., Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Nath, Standing Counsel, PWD.
Page No.# 2/2 –B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
20.08.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)
Mr. T. Sk., learned Advocate for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal as it has become infructuous. The permission is granted. This writ appeal stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
JUDGE CHIEF
JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant