Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/5483/2025 of M/S KHAN ENTERPRISE ALIAS JS ENTERPRISE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010211032025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5483/2025 M/S KHAN ENTERPRISE ALIAS JS ENTERPRISE AND ANR GST NO. 18BOEPK6844P3Z5, SSVR NO. 18041939, MSME NO. AS-040001077, A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010211032025

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/5483/2025

M/S KHAN ENTERPRISE ALIAS JS ENTERPRISE AND ANR

GST NO. 18BOEPK6844P3Z5, SSVR NO. 18041939, MSME NO. AS-040001077, A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR TAHER

UDDIN KHAN, SON OF SHUTU KHAN, R/O VILL- BHARALIPARA PART- I, P.O. NASATRA, SUB-DIST. SRIJANGRAM DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-

783384.

2: M/S E NT ENTERPRISE ALIAS MS TEWARY ENTERPRISE

GST-18AMFPA9387B2Z1

SSVR-18011690M NSNE- AS 190001468

A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ERFAN ALI

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

R/O DOTMA PT.I

P.O. DOTMA

DIST. KOKRAJHAR

ASSAM

PIN-78334

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE MISSION DIRECTOR

SAMAGRA SIKSHA

AXOM

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI- 781019

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B PURKAYASTHA, MR. S SUTRADHAR

Page No.# 2/2

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, SSA

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

20.08.2026 Shri B. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri B. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department and Shri G. Bokolial, learned State Counsel. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead