Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4795/2018 of UJJAL KR. TANTI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. on 18 August 2026
GAHC010157052018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4795/2018 UJJAL KR. TANTI S/O. LT. MARKANDHA TANTI, R/O. D.C. COLONY, DIPHU, P.O. AND P.S. DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM-782460. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010157052018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4795/2018
UJJAL KR. TANTI
S/O. LT. MARKANDHA TANTI, R/O. D.C. COLONY, DIPHU, P.O. AND P.S.
DIPHU, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM-782460.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FINANCE
DEPTT., DISPUR,GHY.-781006.
2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER
KARBI ANGLONG
DIPHU
ASSAM-781006
3:MRIDUL KUMAR MAHANTA
THE DY. COMMISSIONER
KARBI ANGLONG
DIPHU-782460.
4:SRI APURBA KR. CHOUDHURY
JUNIOR ACCOUNT ASSTT.
BOKAJAN SUB-TREASURY OFFICE
BOKAJAN
DIST. KARBI ANGLONG
ASSAM-782480
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS, MS A PHUKAN,MR. D TIWARI,MR. M
KALITA,MR. J HATIMURIA
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. B GOGOI,SC, FINANCE,MD S HUSSAIN
(R4),MR. B CHAKRABORTY (R4),MRS P HAZARIKA (R4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19.08.2026 Heard Mr. J. Hatimuria, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Advocate and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department. Mr. J. Hatimuria, learned counsel, submits that during the pendency of the instant writ petition the matter has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant