Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/523/2025 of ARUNA RAJKHOWA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 18 August 2026
GAHC010009012025 2026:GAU-AS:11802 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/523/2025 ARUNA RAJKHOWA D/O- LATE MALIRAM RAJKHOWA, R/O- VILLAGE PACHANI BORA GAON, P.O.- KHONGIA, P.S.- DERGAON, DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT, 785614, ASSAM. VERSUS
GAHC010009012025
2026:GAU-AS:11802
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/523/2025
ARUNA RAJKHOWA
D/O- LATE MALIRAM RAJKHOWA,
R/O- VILLAGE PACHANI BORA GAON,
P.O.- KHONGIA, P.S.- DERGAON,
DISTRICT- GOLAGHAT, 785614,
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS),
GUWAHATI-6, DISPUR.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6.
4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
ASSAM
OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E)
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI-29.
5:SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ( A AND E)
MAIDAMGAON
BELTOLA
GUWAHATI- 29.
6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD ROADS
GOLAGHAT DIVISION.
7:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD
DERGAON RAOD SUB-DIVISION
GOLAGHAT.
8:UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
PUBLIC WORKS ROADS (AUDIT BRANCH) DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MR. U S BORA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, MR. S K MEDHI (SC, AG,(A AND E)),SC, AG,SC, FINANCE DEPTT.,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
19.08.2026.
Heard Mr. U.S. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam, Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel for the Finance Department, Ms. M. Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and Mr. C.K.S. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3. Mr. Bora, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency the matter, it has become infructuous, as the petitioner is receiving the pensionary amount as claimed in the present writ petition. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter. Accordingly the matter stands dismissed for being infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant