Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/3921/2025 of BIREN HAJONG Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010148272025 2026:GAU-AS:11810 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3921/2025 BIREN HAJONG S/O AJAY HAJONG, R/O MISSIONPARA, WARD NO. 2, HOUSE NO. 22, LAKHIPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- LAKHIPUR, DIST- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783129

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010148272025

2026:GAU-AS:11810

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/3921/2025

BIREN HAJONG

S/O AJAY HAJONG, R/O MISSIONPARA, WARD NO. 2, HOUSE NO. 22, LAKHIPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- LAKHIPUR, DIST- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783129

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE DIRECTOR

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

ASSAM

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

4:THE DIRECTOR

FINANCE (ECONOMIC AFFAIRS)

ASSAM

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

GOALPARA

ASSAM

Page No.# 2/2

6:THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER

GOALPARA ASSAM

7:THE CHAIRPERSON

LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD

OFFICE OF THE LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD

LAKHIPUR GOALPARA

PIN-783129

8:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

LAKHIPUR MUNICIPAL BOARD

LAKHIPUR GOALPARA

PIN-78312

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S N ADHYAPAK, MS B DAS

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR M CHETIA (R-8),SC, FINANCE

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

19-08-2026

1. Mr. B. Boro, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably settled. Accordingly, no cause of action survives for further adjudication.

2. In view of such submission, the present writ petition stands closed being infructuous.

3. Interim order if any, stands vacated.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead