Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/3088/2025 of NOUSHAD ALI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 18 August 2026
GAHC010120432025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3088/2025 NOUSHAD ALI S/O- TAIJUDDIN AHMED, VILL.- DURGAMARI, P.O.- BIDYAPUR, P.S.- BONGAIGAON, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN - 783380. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010120432025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3088/2025
NOUSHAD ALI
S/O- TAIJUDDIN AHMED, VILL.- DURGAMARI, P.O.- BIDYAPUR, P.S.- BONGAIGAON, DIST.- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN - 783380.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DISTRICT DEFENCE OFFICER CUM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380.
3:THE CIRCLE ORGANIZER OF VILLAGE DEFENCE ORGANISATION
BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380.
4:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL DEFENCE OFFICER CUM OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
BONGAIGAON POLICE STATION
P.O. AND P.S.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783380.
5:PIYAR ALI SARKAR
S/O- NURUL HOQUE
VILL.- DURGAMARI
P.O.- BIDYAPUR
Page No.# 2/2
DIST.- BONGAIGAON
ASSAM
PIN-783372
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MR S H MAHMUD,MR S ISLAM,MS. D
BORA,MS. B CHETIA,MS. F RAHMAN
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19.08.2026 Heard Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that he has received instructions not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the same. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement recorded hereinabove, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE Comparing Assistant