Gauhati High Court
Crl.Pet./103/2022 of AKHIL KR HALOI Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 18 August 2026
GAHC010026792022 2026:GAU-AS:11892 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./103/2022 AKHIL KR HALOI SON OF SRI BHAGABAN HALOI R/O NILACHALPUR NEAR MALIGAON PETROL PUMP, HOUSE NO. 17, P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM PIN
GAHC010026792022
2026:GAU-AS:11892
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./103/2022
AKHIL KR HALOI
SON OF SRI BHAGABAN HALOI
R/O NILACHALPUR
NEAR MALIGAON PETROL PUMP,
HOUSE NO. 17, P.S. JALUKBARI
DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
PIN CODE-781011
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:SRI DHIRAJ BORAH
MANAGER/AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY
BAJAJ FINANCE LTD.
SON OF SRI GHANA BORAH
R/O HOUSE NO. 25
AUGUST KRANTI PATH
JAYANAGAR
781028
BRANCH MANAGAR-
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED
2ND FLOOR
F. TORT BUILDING
KACHARIBASTI ROAD
LACHITNAGAR
GUWAHATI
PIN-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B BHUYAN, MS. B MAHANTA,MS R SAHIN
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. S YASMIN (R-2),MR. M SHARMA (R-2)
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026 Heard Ms. R. Sahin, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No.1.
2. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is preferred by the petitioner, namely, Akhil Kr. Haloi, for quashing of the FIR of Dispur P.S. Case No.2894/2021, dated 11.08.2021, registered under Section 120(B)/406/420/468 IPC. It is to be noted here that the above noted FIR has been registered on the basis of one complaint lodged by one Dhiraj Borah for Bajaj Finance Ltd.
3. It is to be noted here that vide order dated 08.03.2022, scanned copy of the case diary of Dispur P.S. Case No.2894/2021 was called for. Today, Mr. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. submits that after completion of investigation, the I.O. has returned the case as F.R., being F.R. No.3299/2023, dated 15.09.2023, having found no case against the petitioner and at present, no case is pending against him and as such, this petition becomes infructuous and therefore, he has contended to close the same.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that since the investigation culminated in submission of F.R. in the case and since no case is pending at present against the petitioner, this petition may be closed.
5. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this petition stands closed. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE