Gauhati High Court
AB/1633/2026 of BHUM BRAHMA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 18 August 2026
GAHC010148442026 2026:GAU-AS:11816 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1633/2026 BHUM BRAHMA S/O AMAR KUMAR BRAHMA,R/O CHALTATOLA, WARD NO. 4,P.O. KOKRAJHAR, P.S. KOKRAJHAR,DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010148442026
2026:GAU-AS:11816
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1633/2026
BHUM BRAHMA
S/O AMAR KUMAR BRAHMA,R/O CHALTATOLA, WARD NO. 4,P.O.
KOKRAJHAR, P.S. KOKRAJHAR,DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, MS. P BRAHMA,MISS. S PARBIN,MR H A AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, M W AHMED(COMPLAINNANT),A S
KHAN(COMPLAINNANT),J S AHMED(COMPLAINNANT)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026 Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.S Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. J.S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the complainant. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter vide Charge-Sheet No.68/2026 dated 30.07.2026. The petitioner was granted the privilege of interim protection by order dated 21.07.2026. Since the investigation has culminated, it will be upon the petitioner now to approach the learned trial court praying for regular bail, in the event he receives summons in connection with the case. Mr. J.S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the complainant, has placed before this Court a printout of the e-complaint filed by the complainant, alleging that the fiancé of the petitioner herein has been threatening her. The said allegations may lead to another investigation in the matter. However, the same cannot be said to be connected with the present bail application. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned trial court praying for regular bail, in the event he receives summons to face trial. JUDGE Comparing Assistant