Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4150/2026 of YOGI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS on 17 August 2026
GAHC010166272026 2026:GAU-AS:11803 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/4150/2026 YOGI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 106 S.B.K. SOCIETY NEAR RAMJI MANDIR BHATTHA AHMEDABAD380007-GUJARAT. REPRESENTED BY SRI
GAHC010166272026
2026:GAU-AS:11803
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
WP(C)/4150/2026
YOGI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 106
S.B.K. SOCIETY
NEAR RAMJI MANDIR
BHATTHA
AHMEDABAD380007-GUJARAT. REPRESENTED BY SRI TADAR NILO
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA and ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
SOUTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI 110011
2:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF
ARMY HEADQUARTERS
KASHMIR HOUSE
RAJAJI MARG
NEW DELHI 110011
3:THE CHIEF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
HEADQUARTERS CE ARMY NO. 1
DINJAN
POST OFFICE PANITOLA
DISTRICT DIBRUGARH
ASSAM -786183.
4:THE PROJECT MANAGER
ALONG
MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES
ALONG AALO
DISTRICT WEST SIANG
ARUNACHAL PRADESH.
5:THE COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER CWE
HAVING ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OVER PROJECT MANAGER
ALONG.
------------
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. PK Sharma Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. A Gayan, CGC
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
Mr. PK Sharma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to re-file.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that certain new materials have come to light which would be required to be brought on record and taking into account that the same being new plea, the petitioner cannot bring the same by way of an additional affidavit and accordingly there would be a requirement for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to re-file.
3. Ms. A Gayan, the learned CGC submits that she has no objection to the above prayer.
4. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
5. Liberty is given to the petitioner to re-file bringing on record those fresh documents/material.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant